Reasons Why Photographers Don’t Give Out RAW Files

1. RAW Files Are Unfinished Products

A RAW image is just the starting point of the editing process. Photographers capture images with the intention of fine-tuning them later. Just as a chef wouldn’t serve raw ingredients instead of a prepared dish, a photographer won’t provide unprocessed files that don’t represent their best work.

2. File Size and Compatibility Issues

RAW files are significantly larger than JPEGs or PNGs, often ranging from 20MB to 100MB per file, depending on the camera. This makes them difficult to store, share, and open without specialized software such as Adobe Lightroom or Photoshop.

3. Consistency and Branding

Photographers build their reputation on a distinct editing style. Handing over RAW files can lead to inconsistencies if the client edits them in a way that misrepresents the photographer’s work. This could potentially damage the photographer’s brand and professional integrity.

4. Specialized Software is Needed

Unlike JPEGs, which can be opened on any device, RAW files require professional software to view and edit properly. Without these tools, clients may struggle to even open the images, leading to confusion and dissatisfaction.

5. RAW Files Can Be Misinterpreted

RAW images straight out of the camera may appear dull or underwhelming because they lack in-camera processing. Clients unfamiliar with the editing process might assume the photographer delivered low-quality images when, in reality, they just need proper post-production work.

6. Licensing and Copyright Issues

In most cases, photographers retain the copyright to their work. Providing RAW files can sometimes mean relinquishing control over how the images are used. Many photographers include clauses in their contracts that explicitly state RAW files will not be provided to protect their intellectual property.